Home > I Have > I Have A Quirk With Mandrake 10.0 Community

I Have A Quirk With Mandrake 10.0 Community

It auto detects the hard disk correctly (4 GB), but saves its info in the BIOS as 495MB. SourceForge.net. http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/patches/ipw2100-0.61-rf_kill.patch You typed too many patches ;-) Thanks, -yi Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100 0.61 available for download... A Professional Edition for AMD64 is available, but there doesn't seem to be a Personal Edition for AMD64. (As of 3/17/04, the PPC and Sparc editions remain at the 7.3 version,

Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:Did they ever properly fix the LG CDROM problem (Score:4, Insightful) by Qamelian ( 714680 ) writes: on Thursday January 22, 2004 @09:13PM (#8062268) Mandrake and LG It is the main commercial edition of Mandriva Linux, and as such, requires payment for its use. Only one membership is needed if you feel like joining. Re:Join the mandrake club (Score:2, Informative) by Welsh Dwarf ( 743630 ) writes: Either that or buy the PowerPack, that's what I recommend all the time. + Like that you save

This isn't to say that Gentoo is bad or even weird in any absolute sense; it's just not like other Linux distributions. Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:"280,000"... I've used a UnitedLinux beta, the only regular distribution I've used that's related to it is SUSE 9.0. It was also made available via a subscription service, which allowed unlimited downloads of Powerpack editions for the last few Mandriva releases for a set yearly fee.

The LG read-only drives had a bad firmware fault. Gibert in Paris, Sauramps in Montpellier...), Suse is not. Mandriva. Re:Mandrake Linux 10.0 (Score:2, Interesting) by binary paladin ( 684759 ) writes: How can this get flagged as redundant before I'm even reading any similar posts?

Typically, Gentoo installation is Internet-based, but there are options to install entirely from CD-ROMs. Makes a good replacement to Red Hat 9 in my opinion Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:well... (Score:3, Informative) by Slime-dogg ( 120473 ) writes: The cooker versions are for the bleeding Users will be able to choose between a novice-friendly Discovery-like setup or an installation process and desktop aimed at power users. you can try this out I'm pretty sure it was...

Its successor, based on Mandrake 8.2, was titled Multi Network Firewall (MNF). I use Mandrake 9.2, but PCLOS is so much better... These were not included in 0.61 as we are > > trying to limit the fixes that are going into 0.60 so we can finish doing a > > full functionality It wasn't on the ISOs I downloaded for 9.2 I had to go back for that RPM when I needed to use it (and thus discoverd it's absence).

Mandriva Linux Discovery[edit] Mandriva Linux Discovery was a commercial distribution aimed at first-time and novice Linux users. http://wiki.c2.com/?MandrakeLinux April 29th, 2009. ^ "Free Software / Open Source Software". I get the impression that the community release is just a new name for the current download version. Thanks, -yi Re: [Ipw2100-devel] slow load times with ipw2200 module From: James H.

Granted it's not as big a change as from KDE2 to KDE3 but it is still pretty significant: according to the forums there have been several new crash-severity bugs introduced. Mandrake releases every 6 months now anyway. ". Yes there have been quality control issues but my own equipment wasn't affected. Why now? (Score:5, Insightful) by adrianbaugh ( 696007 ) writes: on Thursday January 22, 2004 @07:37PM (#8061521) Homepage Journal This seems like a sucky time to bring out 10.0.

Move is now superseded by Mandriva One and Mandriva Flash. They've got a greata desktop, but if this year's Linuxworld is any indication of where the collective SUSE/Novell connection wants to position themselves, it's in the server market. Visit the following links: Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If true, I'd like to know, otherwise, I'd have some concerns over the legality of their distro...

Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view Slashdot Stories Firehose All Popular Polls Deals Submit Search Slashdot Login or Sign up Topics: Devices Build Entertainment Technology They contain little in the way of flashy install routines or GUI system administration tools. I compiled a > 2.6.9 kernel (link to configuration below), then compiled the ipw2200 > driver.


Even with Mplayer, you can't view most Quicktime videos without the win32 codecs, and they can't be splitted legally from the windows executable. Most of the updates since 7.2 have Re:"280,000"... Check cable? Xandros provides a GUI front-end (called Xandros Network) to the standard Debian APT utilities which enables you to install a modest range of additional packages.

Their model is based on subscription revenue not donations. I do agree on your point with 9.2. thanks alot > > No, you shouldn't see a slow down just because you loaded the driver. > Did you by chance enable a really high debug level and the driver Mandrake, I think, is more complete.

I was embarrassed, though, when I had to replace a friend's CDROM drive when the install of 9.2 went sour. This is excellent and shows that their business model has improved much and potentially makes MandrakeSoft a very profitable company. The third iteration is named MNF 2 and is based upon Mandrakelinux 10.0. Because Red Hat has changed substantially in recent years, I'm providing a new and separate review of Fedora for this page.

In April 2005, Mandrakesoft announced the corporate acquisition of Conectiva, a Brazilian-based company that produced a Linux distribution for Portuguese-speaking (Brazil) and Spanish-speaking Latin America. I also had serious video card problems with the SiS 330; the system was extremley unstable until I replaced the sis_drv.o XFree86 driver file with the equivalent file from a Gentoo This will provide them with a large user base, from which they can spread their inf Re:There can only be One (Score:2) by Quirk ( 36086 ) writes: You're assuming the On my x86-based systems, I installed apt4rpm and used it instead, with good results. (I haven't yet gotten around to installing it on my Athlon 64 system, though.) Fedora's system administration

And while the 9x series sucked in general, 98SE sucked the least.